6 categories · RankedSmartRecruiters
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 3% | 14 of 109 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21% |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 2% | 12 of 88 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Lever at 20% |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 0% | 12 of 50 | 11% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47% |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 28 of 81 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16% |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 34 of 84 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19% |
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 50 of 72 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend SmartRecruiters as the best balance of distribution reach, pipeline management, and source analytics” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“SmartRecruiters - offers a highly configurable CRM solution for mid-sized and large enterprises.” Llama 4 Maverick · Recruiting CRM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Some affordable or free ATS platforms like Lever, SmartRecruiters, or Zoho Recruit help organize candidates without major expense.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruiting CRM · budget prompt · alternative
“systems like Greenhouse, Lever, and SmartRecruiters tend to receive better reviews” Kimi K2 · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Generally decent but performance can lag during peak search and high‑volume periods” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 97 of the 105 answers that named SmartRecruiters and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
320 of the 320 domain citations in answers naming SmartRecruiters came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SmartRecruiters's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SmartRecruiters, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at smartrecruiters.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.