Workday · 4 categories · RankedWorkday Recruiting
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 0% | 49 of 50 | 83% | 12 | criticized challenger |
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 55 of 72 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21% |
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 0% | 99 of 109 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21% |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 59 of 81 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“BambooHR and Workday Recruiting are better if you want recruiting to connect tightly with onboarding, payroll, or other HR systems.” Perplexity Sonar · Applicant tracking syste · comparative prompt · alternative
“Already on Workday? Workday Recruiting.” GPT-5.4 mini · Applicant tracking syste · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Workday lawsuit... alleging that when applying via their ATS, the algorithm resulted in his rejection by more than 100 jobs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · hard negative
“Workday Recruiting — Runner-Up for Worst Experience ... recruiters consistently rank it as "the absolute worst"” Kimi K2 · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why avoid: Widely described as having a clunky user interface and overwhelming workflows” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tops "most frustrating" lists. Job seekers report endless manual re-entry of resume data” Grok 4.1 Fast · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 101 of the 123 answers that named Workday Recruiting and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
341 of the 341 domain citations in answers naming Workday Recruiting came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Workday Recruiting
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Recruiting's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Recruiting, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.