Every category where a model named SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	0%	48 of 50	100%	6	under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	2
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative20 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Why avoid: Overly rigid processes; customization often requires expensive consulting support” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · hard negative

“Repetitive data entry (e.g., retyping job history multiple times), cumbersome for candidates” Grok 4.1 Fast · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · hard negative

“SAP SuccessFactors — Rigid and Inflexible ... Overly complex and difficult to customize” Kimi K2 · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · hard negative

“Also receives consistent complaints” MiniMax M2.5 · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workday Recruiting40 of 421Not in the top three

iCIMS36 of 428Not in the top three

Greenhouse35 of 4215Not in the top three

Oracle Taleo31 of 420Not in the top three

Lever25 of 421Not in the top three

SmartRecruiters20 of 420Not in the top three

Ashby9 of 420Not in the top three

Bullhorn9 of 420Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand8 of 420Not in the top three

Breezy HR6 of 422Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 37 of the 42 answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com22

darwinbox.com19

greenhouse.com16

blog.supportfinity.com15

peoplemanagingpeople.com15

reddit.com15

bestrecruitingtools.com13

g2.com13

linkedin.com12

pinpointhq.com11

151 of the 151 domain citations in answers naming SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

darwinbox.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems-enterprise19

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/applicant-tracking-systems19

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-applicant-tracking-systems15

reddit.com/r/Recruitment/comments/19bnsna/whats_the_best_and_worst_applicant_tracking15

blog.supportfinity.com/most-common-recruitment-problems-with-workday-successfactors-oracle13

greenhouse.com/blog/enterprise-applicant-tracking-systems10

hrcloud.com/blog/ats-buyers-guide9

pinpointhq.com/insights/best-applicant-tracking-system8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting; a claim can dispute any of them.

SAP SuccessFactors 5SuccessFactors (SAP) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.