AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Talent acquisition › Staffing agency tools › Lever vs Loxo
Staffing agency platforms · October 2026 Edition

Lever vs Loxo

Zero of fourteen models named Lever first on the direct prompt; one named Loxo. Lever was named by nine of the fourteen models and Loxo by eight and Lever carries 10 labels and Loxo 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Lever

accepted challenger

Named in thirteen categories this edition.

Loxo

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share5%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1013A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Lever reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Bullhorn was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Zoho Recruit vs Lever · Zoho Recruit vs Loxo · Bullhorn vs Lever

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the staffing agency platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LeverFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLoxo
Direct01
Paraphrase31
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Lever
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Lever and Loxo stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Lever Loxo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Lever on the left and Loxo on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Lever and Loxo stood in it.

Loxo first, Lever not the choice

1 of 14 modelsLever was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashLoxo, Worksome alternatives: Bullhorn, Deel, JobAdder, Recruit CRM, TalentDesk.io

Neither was named

13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniBullhorn alternatives: Aviont\u00e9, JobAdder, Recruit CRM, Vincere
Perplexity SonarBullhorn alternatives: Recruit CRM, Recruiterflow
Grok 4.1 FastBullhorn alternatives: Aviont\u00e9, TempWorks, Vincere
Mistral SmallBullhorn, Ceipal ATS alternatives: Avionté, Recruit CRM
DeepSeek V4 FlashVincere alternatives: Bullhorn, PCRecruiter
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashJobAdder alternatives: Aptos, Bullhorn, RecruitCRM
Kimi K2Vincere alternatives: Crelate, JobAdder
GLM 4.7 FlashXBullhorn alternatives: Avionte, Deelo, JobAdder, Recruit CRM, Vincere
MiniMax M2.5Recruiterflow, Vincere alternatives: Ceipal, Manatal
GPT-6 LunaPixid VMS alternatives: Conexis VMS, Workday VNDLY
Muse Glimmer 30BBullhorn alternatives: JobAdder, Recruit CRM, Vincere

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Loxo leads by two points.
Loxo2%#7 of 10
Lever0%#– of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Lever leads at mid-market.
Lever5%#6 of 12
Loxo3%#8 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Lever0%#– of 11
Loxo0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Lever

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“better suited to internal hiring than external or high-volume staffing, so they can be a poor fit for agencies” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you want a single platform that handles both active applicants and passive candidates with strong nurturing and automation: Go with Lever or Ashby.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Loxo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Loxo has become the premium standard for modern recruiting agencies by combining multiple tools into a single platform.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Go with Loxo or Recruiterflow” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.