HR AI Index
Index Talent acquisition Technical hiring assessm › CodeSignal vs Codility
Technical hiring assessments · September 2026 Edition

CodeSignal vs Codility

Two of twelve models named CodeSignal first on the direct prompt; one named Codility. Both were named by all twelve models and CodeSignal carries 41 labels and Codility 44, so the shares are not directly comparable.

CodeSignal

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Codility

criticized challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share10%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%32%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 6; printed, not drawn.
Labels4144A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, CodeSignal reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.HackerRank was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. HackerRank vs CodeSignal · HackerRank vs Codility · CoderPad vs CodeSignal

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the technical hiring assessments page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CodeSignalFirst choices, of twelve modelsCodility
Direct211 against Codility
Paraphrase202 against Codility
Comparative12
Budget-constrained004 against Codility
Scale-constrained01
Negative104 against CodeSignal · 7 against Codility
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, CodeSignal and Codility were named in the same answer 100 times, of the 141 answers naming CodeSignal and the 186 naming Codility. In those answers Codility took the first choice seven times and CodeSignal twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where CodeSignal and Codility stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
CodeSignal Codility first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, CodeSignal on the left and Codility on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where CodeSignal and Codility stood in it.

CodeSignal first, Codility an alternative

2 of 12 modelsCodility was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
DeepSeek V4 FlashCodeSignal alternatives: Codility, HackerRank, TestGorilla
MiniMax M2.5CodeSignal alternatives: Augment Code, HackerRank, TestGorilla

Codility first, CodeSignal an alternative

1 of 12 modelsCodeSignal was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Kimi K2Codility alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank, TestGorilla

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, CoderPad, Codility
Gemini 3.5 FlashCoderPad alternatives: CodeSignal, HackerEarth, TestGorilla
Perplexity SonarHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, CoderPad, Coderbyte, Goodfit
Grok 4.1 FastHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice alternatives: CodeSignal, CoderPad, Coderbyte, Goodfit, HackerRank
Qwen 3.7 FlashHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, TestDome, Vervoe
GLM 4.7 FlashXHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal

Neither was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Mistral SmallHackerRank alternatives: Augment Code, Coderbyte

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
CodeSignal leads by seven points.
CodeSignal7%#6 of 7
Codility0%#7 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
CodeSignal leads by five points.
CodeSignal10%#4 of 6
Codility5%#6 of 6
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Codility leads at enterprise.
Codility19%#2 of 6
CodeSignal12%#3 of 6
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about CodeSignal

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“It punishes deliberate, methodical thinking... a poor score on one application can actively destroy your chances with other companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“CodeSignal's scoring algorithm incorporates "speed" heavily ... can unfairly penalize candidates who are careful but methodical.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Expensive compared to alternatives ... Assessments have been reported as "flawed" with technical issues” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“(or CodeSignal if you like the "certified engineer" benchmark). Both integrate with most ATS platforms” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best for: All-around use, standardized pre-screening at scale, live technical interviews” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Popular ones like CoderPad or CodeSignal have better reps for collaborative/live coding.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Codility

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“it is often described as "quite pricey" ... Codility has had issues with "test integrity," where questions and answers are not sufficiently hidden from recruiters” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Opaque scoring: Candidates and reviewers criticize edge-case scoring and lack of transparency” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why we recommend avoiding HackerRank or Codility (for now)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Codility offers the best balance of capability, reputation, and price” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Often ranked as the best overall, especially for enterprise use.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.