Six of twelve models named HackerRank first on the direct prompt; two named CodeSignal. Both were named by all twelve models and HackerRank carries 57 labels and CodeSignal 41, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the technical hiring assessments page.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, HackerRank and CodeSignal were named in the same answer 128 times, of the 233 answers naming HackerRank and the 141 naming CodeSignal. In those answers CodeSignal took the first choice thirteen times and HackerRank thirty-three.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Users frequently complain about "overage fees." ... Googleable Questions: ... default assessments are often easily searchable online.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“buggy UI/UX ... High drop-off rates and "horrible experience" sentiments” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why we recommend avoiding HackerRank or Codility (for now)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Qualified (free) and HackerRank Starter ($99/mo) offer the best balance of cost, reliability, and candidate familiarity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for: End-to-end enterprise technical hiring. ... broadest platform and largest general hiring workflow” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best *default* choice is usually HackerRank if your priority is technical hiring at scale” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“It punishes deliberate, methodical thinking... a poor score on one application can actively destroy your chances with other companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“CodeSignal's scoring algorithm incorporates "speed" heavily ... can unfairly penalize candidates who are careful but methodical.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Expensive compared to alternatives ... Assessments have been reported as "flawed" with technical issues” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“(or CodeSignal if you like the "certified engineer" benchmark). Both integrate with most ATS platforms” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best for: All-around use, standardized pre-screening at scale, live technical interviews” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Popular ones like CoderPad or CodeSignal have better reps for collaborative/live coding.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.