AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Talent acquisition › Technical hiring assessm › Codility vs HackerEarth
Technical hiring assessments · October 2026 Edition

Codility vs HackerEarth

Three of fourteen models named Codility first on the direct prompt; one named HackerEarth. Codility was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and HackerEarth by eleven and Codility carries 53 labels and HackerEarth 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Codility

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

HackerEarth

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share9%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate25%13%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels5315A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Codility reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.HackerRank was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. HackerRank vs Codility · HackerRank vs HackerEarth · CodeSignal vs Codility

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the technical hiring assessments page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CodilityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsHackerEarth
Direct312 against Codility
Paraphrase101 against Codility
Comparative201 against HackerEarth
Budget-constrained032 against Codility
Scale-constrained10
Negative008 against Codility · 1 against HackerEarth
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Codility and HackerEarth were named in the same answer thirty-two times, of the 212 answers naming Codility and the 44 naming HackerEarth. In those answers HackerEarth took the first choice one time and Codility four.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Codility and HackerEarth stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Codility HackerEarth first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Codility on the left and HackerEarth on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Codility and HackerEarth stood in it.

Codility first, HackerEarth not the choice

3 of 14 modelsHackerEarth was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
DeepSeek V4 FlashCodility alternatives: CodeSignal, HackerRank
GLM 4.7 FlashXCodility, TestGorilla alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank
MiniMax M2.5Codility alternatives: AssessHub, CoderPad, HackerRank

HackerEarth first, Codility not the choice

1 of 14 modelsCodility was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5HackerEarth, TestGorilla alternatives: CodeSignal

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, Codility
Grok 4.1 FastHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, CoderPad, Coderbyte, Codility
Qwen 3.7 FlashCodeSignal alternatives: CoderPad, Codility, TestGorilla, Voomer
Muse Glimmer 30BCodeSignal, DevSkiller, HackerRank alternatives: Codility

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCoderPad, Woven alternatives: CodeSignal
Perplexity SonarCodeSignal alternatives: Coderbyte, DevSkiller
Mistral SmallGoodfit alternatives: HackerRank
Llama 4 MaverickGoodfit alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank
Kimi K2Coderbyte alternatives: HackerRank, TestGorilla
GPT-6 LunaCodeSignal Hire Grow alternatives: CoderPad, HackerRank

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Codility leads by two points.
Codility3%#7 of 8
HackerEarth2%#– of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Codility leads by two points.
Codility9%#6 of 9
HackerEarth7%#7 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Codility leads by nine points.
Codility11%#4 of 8
HackerEarth2%#5 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Codility

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Avoid if budget is the main constraint... Codility tends to start higher and is more enterprise-oriented” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“(e.g., HackerRank, Codility, CodeSignal): ... often criticized for not reflecting real-world job tasks” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“High negative sentiment (e.g., labeled "hostile candidate experience" in AI model analyses)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“### 1. Codility - Best for: Mid-market to enterprise companies needing secure, scalable assessments” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose HackerRank or Codility if you are an enterprise needing rigorous automated screening” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about HackerEarth

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Similar to HackerRank in being low-cost, but with less-modern technology.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“Weaker auto-cheat detection per tests.” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · soft negative
“For mid-market B2B companies specifically, HackerEarth and TestGorilla stand out for their balance of features, pricing accessibility, and ATS integration compatibility” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“The best coding assessment platform for a company with a limited budget is HackerEarth, which offers coding tests and live technical interviews on a modest budget.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“HackerEarth or TestGorilla would be the best starting points due to their affordability” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.