HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Aisera · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Aisera

5Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Aisera was named 1 time in HR AI assistants, where Workativ Assistant led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business83 of 105

under the label threshold

Mid-market74 of 119

under the label threshold

Enterprise84 of 108

under the label threshold

In hr ai assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Aisera for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
HR AI assistants	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	74 of 119	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Workativ Assistant at 12%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Aisera yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Aisera across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Aisera, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aisera was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Leena AI4 of 51Not in the top three

Moveworks4 of 51Not in the top three

Workativ Assistant4 of 50Not in the top three

Humand3 of 50Not in the top three

Espressive2 of 50Not in the top three

Rippling2 of 50Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors2 of 50Not in the top three

Workday Illuminate2 of 50Not in the top three

Gusto1 of 51Not in the top three

MeBeBot1 of 51Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aisera. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Aisera and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hrtechsaas.com4

workativ.com4

humand.co3

anywherer.com2

herothemes.com2

hrlineup.com2

moveworks.com2

sanalabs.com2

teamspective.com2

wonderchat.io2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Aisera came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

humand.co/en/compare/best-ai-powered-hr-software-tools3

anywherer.com/best-ai-agents-for-hr2

herothemes.com/blog/hr-chatbots2

hrlineup.com/best-ai-agent-platforms-for-hr-teams2

hrtechsaas.com/blog/servicenow-hrsd-vs-workday-help-vs-moveworks2

moveworks.com/us/en/resources/blog/best-ai-assistants-for-hr-efficiency2

sanalabs.com/agents-blog/hr-ai-agents-work-assistants2

teamspective.com/blog/ai-hr-assistant2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aisera's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aisera, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aisera.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.