Every category where a model named Alight Solutions for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Benefits administration	Core HR and payroll	0%	33 of 54	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by PlanSource at 23%
Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accounts	Compensation and total rewards	0%	47 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Compt at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Alight Solutions yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Alight Solutions across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative13 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“add bswift or Alight as a specialist overlay” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Benefits administration · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Slow/atrocious response times, inaccessible UI for non-tech users, poor communication” Grok 4.1 Fast · Benefits administration · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Alight Solutions, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Alight Solutions was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

bswift27 of 345Not in the top three

Benefitfocus22 of 344Not in the top three

Rippling22 of 342Not in the top three

Workday HCM21 of 347Not in the top three

ADP Workforce Now16 of 345Not in the top three

PlanSource14 of 340Not in the top three

ADP10 of 342Not in the top three

UKG Pro10 of 341Not in the top three

Forma9 of 345Not in the top three

Gusto8 of 340Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Alight Solutions. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 34 answers that named Alight Solutions and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com20

learn.g2.com16

gartner.com13

g2.com11

cxeverywhere.com10

getbenepass.com10

mybentek.com10

adp.com9

aibusinessgeek.com9

hibob.com8

116 of the 116 domain citations in answers naming Alight Solutions came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/benefits-administration-software19

learn.g2.com/best-benefits-administration-software-for-enterprises16

gartner.com/reviews/market/benefits-management13

cxeverywhere.com/tools/benefits-administration-software10

aibusinessgeek.com/articles/ai-benefits-administration-software-20269

adp.com/resources/articles-and-insights/articles/b/best-employee-benefits-administration-s8

hibob.com/blog/best-benefits-administration-software8

mybentek.com/industry-news/top-benefits-administration-platforms-for-complex-organizations8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Alight Solutions

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Alight Solutions; a claim can dispute any of them.

Alight 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Alight Solutions's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Alight Solutions, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at alight.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.