HR AI Index
Index Vendors › BeenVerified · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

BeenVerified

13Judge labels
0First choices
11Negative labels
3 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BeenVerified was named 6 times in Background screening, where Checkr led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In background screening · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BeenVerified for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Background screeningTalent acquisition0%57 of 5967%6under 10 labels · led by Checkr at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BeenVerified yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BeenVerified across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00123
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00112
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“These sites are not consumer reporting agencies (CRAs)... do not use it for any professional background screening.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Background screening · negative prompt · hard negative
“Never use consumer search sites like BeenVerified or TruthFinder for hiring; they are not FCRA-compliant” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Background screening · budget prompt · hard negative
“not FCRA-compliant and can't be used for hiring/tenancy decisions—doing so risks fines/lawsuits” Grok 4.1 Fast · Background screening · comparative prompt · hard negative
“Why avoid: These are not FCRA-compliant consumer reporting agencies.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Background screening · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BeenVerified, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BeenVerified was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TruthFinder11 of 130Not in the top three
Checkr10 of 135Not in the top three
HireRight9 of 130Not in the top three
Instant Checkmate8 of 130Not in the top three
Spokeo8 of 130Not in the top three
Certn7 of 132Not in the top three
First Advantage7 of 130Not in the top three
GoodHire6 of 131Not in the top three
Sterling6 of 130Not in the top three
Accurate Background5 of 130Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BeenVerified. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 13 answers that named BeenVerified and are not a share of its labels.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BeenVerified's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BeenVerified, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at beenverified.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack