HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › beqom Pay Equity · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

beqom Pay Equity

8Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. beqom Pay Equity was named 1 time in Pay equity, where Syndio led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market47 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprise7 of 52

under the label threshold

In pay equity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named beqom Pay Equity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Pay equity	Compensation and total rewards	0%	47 of 60	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for beqom Pay Equity yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated beqom Pay Equity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If pay equity should live inside compensation planning, look at beqom” Perplexity Sonar · Pay equity · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as beqom Pay Equity, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and beqom Pay Equity was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Syndio8 of 87Not in the top three

Trusaic PayParity8 of 80Not in the top three

PayAnalytics7 of 81Not in the top three

Affirmity4 of 80Not in the top three

Compport4 of 80Not in the top three

Aeqium3 of 80Not in the top three

Payscale3 of 80Not in the top three

Visier3 of 80Not in the top three

Barley1 of 80Not in the top three

CompUp1 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named beqom Pay Equity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named beqom Pay Equity and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com8

gartner.com7

peoplemanagingpeople.com7

synd.io5

trusaic.com5

beqom.comYour site4

compport.com4

payanalytics.com4

sourceforge.net4

wifitalents.com4

Forty-eight of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming beqom Pay Equity came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/pay-equity-software8

gartner.com/reviews/market/pay-equity-software7

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-pay-equity-software7

compport.com/blog/best-pay-equity-software4

trusaic.com/payparity4

wifitalents.com/best/pay-equity-analysis-software4

pay-equity-software.com/tools3

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-ai-pay-equity-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when beqom Pay Equity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as beqom Pay Equity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at beqom.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.