Every category where a model named CompUp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Pay equity	Compensation and total rewards	2%	14 of 60	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 17%
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	2%	15 of 189	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CompUp yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CompUp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels4

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels4

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CompUp - A full-stack compensation management platform that is particularly well-suited for mid-sized to large organisations” Llama 4 Maverick · Compensation management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If budget is the top priority, start with CompUp.” GPT-5.4 mini · Compensation management · budget prompt · first choice

“Best Overall Choice: CompUp” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Strong if you want to run extensive budget simulations, build custom salary bands, and require robust pay equity analysis tools.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compensation management · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CompUp, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CompUp was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

beqom9 of 200Not in the top three

Pave7 of 204Not in the top three

Comprehensive7 of 202Not in the top three

Deel7 of 200Not in the top three

HRSoft7 of 200Not in the top three

Payscale7 of 200Not in the top three

Aeqium6 of 202Not in the top three

Ravio6 of 201Not in the top three

Compport6 of 200Not in the top three

Syndio5 of 202Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CompUp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 20 answers that named CompUp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com12

guideflow.com9

peoplemanagingpeople.com9

comprehensive.io7

captivateiq.com6

compport.com6

compup.ioYour site6

ravio.com6

hibob.com5

hrtechsaas.com5

Sixty-five of the seventy-one domain citations in answers naming CompUp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-management-software7

gartner.com/reviews/market/compensation-management-software6

gartner.com/reviews/market/pay-equity-software6

compport.com/blog/best-pay-equity-software5

guideflow.com/blog/pay-equity-software5

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-pay-equity-software5

captivateiq.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software4

deel.com/blog/10-compensation-management-systems-mid-size-companies4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CompUp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CompUp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at compup.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.