HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Chime Workplace · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Chime Workplace

39Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Earned wage access for enterprise buyers
Rank 13 of 61 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In earned wage access · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Chime Workplace for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Earned wage accessCompensation and total rewards0%13 of 610%11accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Chime Workplace yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Chime Workplace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast02002
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01203
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained10 labels2
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative39 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Rain, Immediate, or Chime Workplace if your priority is a simpler, employer-sponsored model with lower or no worker fees.” Perplexity Sonar · Earned wage access · comparative prompt · alternative
“Employers seeking seamless payroll integration and fee-free options may prefer Chime Workplace™” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Earned wage access · comparative prompt · alternative
“Employers can offer no-fee earned wage access, embedded in a broader financial wellness suite” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Earned wage access · budget prompt · alternative
“$0 (to Chime acct) ... Truly free; overdraft tools | Requires Chime account” Grok 4.1 Fast · Earned wage access · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Chime Workplace, over the 39 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chime Workplace was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
DailyPay33 of 3915Not in the top three
Payactiv33 of 397Not in the top three
Tapcheck24 of 3910Not in the top three
ZayZoon22 of 397Not in the top three
Rain21 of 392Not in the top three
Branch21 of 390Not in the top three
EarnIn16 of 391Not in the top three
Immediate8 of 390Not in the top three
Clair5 of 390Not in the top three
Stream3 of 390Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chime Workplace. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 39 answers that named Chime Workplace and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

enterprise.chime.comYour site35
guideflow.com25
g2.com18
hrtechsaas.com18
juicefin.com18
pickmysoft.com17
best-earned-wage-access-providers-usa.lovable.app16
fintechspecs.com15
us.fitgap.com15
worldmetrics.org15

157 of the 192 domain citations in answers naming Chime Workplace came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Chime Workplace

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Chime Workplace; a claim can dispute any of them.
Chime Workplace™ 2
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chime Workplace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chime Workplace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at chime.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack