HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Immediate · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Immediate

27Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Earned wage access for enterprise buyers
Rank 14 of 61 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In earned wage access · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Immediate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Earned wage accessCompensation and total rewards0%14 of 610%5under 10 labels · led by Tapcheck at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Immediate yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Immediate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Rain, Immediate, or Chime Workplace if your priority is a simpler, employer-sponsored model with lower or no worker fees.” Perplexity Sonar · Earned wage access · comparative prompt · alternative
“Tapcheck and Immediate are also strong contenders” MiniMax M2.5 · Earned wage access · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Immediate is an excellent mid-market specialist.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Earned wage access · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for HR Control & Transparent Pricing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Earned wage access · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Immediate, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Immediate was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
DailyPay22 of 2715Not in the top three
Payactiv22 of 275Not in the top three
Tapcheck19 of 274Not in the top three
Rain17 of 271Not in the top three
ZayZoon15 of 274Not in the top three
Branch9 of 270Not in the top three
Chime Workplace8 of 270Not in the top three
Clair5 of 270Not in the top three
EarnIn5 of 270Not in the top three
Paylocity3 of 270Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Immediate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 27 answers that named Immediate and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

enterprise.chime.com19
hrtechsaas.com18
pickmysoft.com12
guideflow.com11
fintechspecs.com10
g2.com10
best-earned-wage-access-providers-usa.lovable.app9
juicefin.com8
us.fitgap.com8
tapcheck.com7

112 of the 112 domain citations in answers naming Immediate came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Immediate

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Immediate; a claim can dispute any of them.
Immediate (ImmediatePay) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Immediate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Immediate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at immediate.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack