HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Compliance Training Online · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Compliance Training Online

4Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
3 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Compliance Training Online was named 2 times in Compliance training, where Traliant led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In compliance training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Compliance Training Online for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Compliance trainingLearning and development0%78 of 80100%2under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Compliance Training Online yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Compliance Training Online across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“has received consistent criticism on review sites regarding its user experience and billing practices” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compliance training · negative prompt · hard negative
“Mixed Trustpilot (3.8/5); some scam accusations for not delivering advertised online MSHA certification, technical glitches, unresponsive support.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compliance training · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Compliance Training Online, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Compliance Training Online was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
EasyLlama2 of 42Not in the top three
Ethena2 of 41Not in the top three
Traliant2 of 41Not in the top three
360training1 of 40Not in the top three
BizLibrary1 of 40Not in the top three
Emtrain1 of 40Not in the top three
International Compliance Association1 of 40Not in the top three
J.J. Keller & Associates1 of 40Not in the top three
OSHA.gov1 of 40Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Compliance Training Online. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Compliance Training Online and are not a share of its labels.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Compliance Training Online's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Compliance Training Online, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at compliancetrainingonline.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack