Every category where a model named Coursera for Business for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Online course libraries	Learning and development	2%	6 of 73	18%	39	accepted challenger
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	78 of 80	67%	6	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%
Compliance training	Learning and development	0%	35 of 80	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Coursera for Business yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Coursera for Business across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	2	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1	1	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	3	6
Mistral Small	0	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	3	1	0	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	2	0	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	3	2	7
Kimi K2	1	0	0	2	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	2	1	5
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	1	1	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct26 labels5

Paraphrase21 labels3

Comparative29 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained22 labelsNone

Scale-constrained10 labels1

Negative19 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative127 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest starting with Cornerstone Content Subscriptions or Coursera for Business as they offer the best balance” MiniMax M2.5 · Online course libraries · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Academic/degree‑oriented learners should lean on Coursera and edX for rigorous, university‑backed content.” MiniMax M2.5 · Online course libraries · comparative prompt · first choice

“University degree or accredited certificate | Coursera or edX” Kimi K2 · Online course libraries · comparative prompt · first choice

“Career changers / formal credentials → Coursera or edX” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Online course libraries · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Subscription issues: Free trials automatically converting to paid subscriptions without clear notice” MiniMax M2.5 · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · hard negative

“too pricey for limited budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · Online course libraries · budget prompt · hard negative

“Be cautious of platforms like Coursera, LinkedIn Learning, edX, and Udemy if you haven't verified the specific course, instructor, and refund policy.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative

“Coursera, for example, has a strict policy of no refunds for monthly subscriptions once they have auto-renewed” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Online course libraries · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Coursera for Business, over the 125 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coursera for Business was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Udemy Business110 of 12527Not in the top three

LinkedIn Learning110 of 12525Not in the top three

Pluralsight50 of 1252Not in the top three

Skillsoft Percipio44 of 1252Not in the top three

TalentLMS25 of 1253Not in the top three

Docebo19 of 1252Not in the top three

Skillshare18 of 1250Not in the top three

GoSkills17 of 1259Not in the top three

edX16 of 1252Not in the top three

Go116 of 1251Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coursera for Business. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 93 of the 125 answers that named Coursera for Business and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com47

goodhabitz.com41

linkedin.com38

proprofstraining.com36

business.linkedin.com32

coursera.orgYour site29

goskills.com27

docebo.com26

elearningindustry.com25

ispringsolutions.com25

297 of the 326 domain citations in answers naming Coursera for Business came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

goodhabitz.com/resources/blog/elearning-content-providers29

business.linkedin.com/learn/compare-plans26

linkedin.com/pulse/corporate-learning-platforms-small-teams-practical-guide-vlad-levinas-x26

ispringsolutions.com/blog/the-15-best-off-the-shelf-elearning-content-providers24

simplilearn.com/best-online-learning-platforms-for-enterprises-article21

goodhabitz.com/resources/blog/best-online-learning-platforms-for-professional-team-develop20

proprofstraining.com/blog/b2b-lms18

coursera.org/business/teams17

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Coursera for Business

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Coursera for Business; a claim can dispute any of them.

Coursera 17Coursera for Teams 5Coursera Business 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coursera for Business's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coursera for Business, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coursera.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.