Every category where a model named edX for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	21 of 162	8%	13	accepted challenger
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	19 of 73	22%	9	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	52 of 80	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for edX yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated edX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	1	1	5
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Kimi K2	1	1	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	3	0	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative16 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need a formal degree or employer‑recognized credential, Coursera or edX are the go‑to platforms.” MiniMax M2.5 · Online course libraries · comparative prompt · first choice

“Alternatives with strong reps: Khan Academy (free), edX, LinkedIn Learning.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · first choice

“Safer bets... edX... tend to grade better on consumer-friendliness” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Skills intelligence · negative prompt · first choice

“University degree or accredited certificate | Coursera or edX” Kimi K2 · Online course libraries · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid: White-Label University Bootcamps (Trilogy / 2U / edX)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Skills intelligence · negative prompt · hard negative

“Examples: EdX and Coursera (when treated incorrectly). ... you should avoid buying the certificate” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Online course libraries · negative prompt · soft negative

“Not "libraries" for corporate—certificates extra, less flexible” Grok 4.1 Fast · Online course libraries · negative prompt · soft negative

“learners report usability and grading issues” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as edX, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and edX was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Udemy Business29 of 320Not in the top three

LinkedIn Learning27 of 320Not in the top three

Coursera for Business16 of 320Not in the top three

Coursera14 of 322Not in the top three

Skillshare14 of 320Not in the top three

MasterClass11 of 320Not in the top three

Pluralsight Skills9 of 320Not in the top three

Pluralsight8 of 320Not in the top three

Khan Academy7 of 320Not in the top three

OpenSesame6 of 321Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named edX. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 32 answers that named edX and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com9

linkedin.com8

reddit.com7

course.careers6

pcmag.com6

skillscouter.com6

checkthat.ai5

opensesame.com5

acorn.works4

aliens.courses4

Sixty of the sixty domain citations in answers naming edX came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pcmag.com/picks/best-online-learning-services6

opensesame.com/blog/top-skills-training-platforms-20265

skillscouter.com/best-online-learning-platforms5

onlinecerthub.com/coursera-vs-edx-vs-udemy-vs-linkedin-learning4

stuartkerrs.com/online-course-platforms-comparison4

360learning.com/blog/skills-based-learning-platforms3

acorn.works/best/the-9-best-skills-based-learning-platforms-in-20263

buddyboss.com/blog/best-online-learning-platforms-for-professionals-and-learners3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as edX

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as edX; a claim can dispute any of them.

edX for Business 2EdX 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when edX's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as edX, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at edx.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.