HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Pluralsight Skills · September 2026 Edition
Pluralsight · 1 category · Ranked

Pluralsight Skills

27Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Skills intelligence for mid-market buyers
Rank 24 of 162 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 12 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In skills intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Pluralsight Skills for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Skills intelligencePerformance and talent management0%24 of 1628%12accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Pluralsight Skills yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Pluralsight Skills across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00011
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative19 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you're focused on technical skills development, Pluralsight offers affordable per-user pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative
“Consider Pluralsight if you also need a learning platform” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative
“Udacity/Pluralsight for tech skills” Grok 4.1 Fast · Skills intelligence · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Pluralsight - not recommended for certain goals, such as creative/design skills or budget under $200/year.” Llama 4 Maverick · Skills intelligence · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Pluralsight Skills, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pluralsight Skills was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Udemy Business15 of 271Not in the top three
Coursera14 of 272Not in the top three
LinkedIn Learning12 of 270Not in the top three
AG59 of 270Not in the top three
edX9 of 270Not in the top three
Skillshare8 of 270Not in the top three
Skills Base7 of 276Not in the top three
Fuel506 of 272Not in the top three
SkillPanel6 of 272Not in the top three
360Learning6 of 271Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pluralsight Skills. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 27 answers that named Pluralsight Skills and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

opensesame.com10
peoplemanagingpeople.com10
360learning.com8
firsthr.app8
fuel50.com8
worldmetrics.org7
cloudassess.com6
g2.com6
guideflow.com6
hrtechsaas.com5

Seventy-four of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming Pluralsight Skills came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Pluralsight Skills

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Pluralsight Skills; a claim can dispute any of them.
Pluralsight 11
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pluralsight Skills's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pluralsight Skills, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pluralsight.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack