Every category where a model named SkillPanel for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	4%	7 of 162	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SkillPanel yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SkillPanel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	2	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels2

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels2

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“specialized mid-market platforms like TechWolf, 365Talents, or SkillPanel may be a better fit” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Skills intelligence · scale prompt · first choice

“I'd usually pick SkillPanel if you want something simpler and faster to operationalize” GPT-5.4 mini · Skills intelligence · direct prompt · first choice

“If you need a vendor-supported product and can spend a bit more: SkillPanel is a reasonable place to start evaluating.” GPT-5.4 mini · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative

“SkillPanel: From ~$1/user/month. Focuses on skills gaps, development paths, internal mobility” Grok 4.1 Fast · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SkillPanel, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SkillPanel was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Skills Base15 of 2510Not in the top three

Eightfold AI12 of 250Not in the top three

AG510 of 251Not in the top three

Gloat9 of 250Not in the top three

MuchSkills8 of 252Not in the top three

365Talents7 of 250Not in the top three

Pluralsight Skills6 of 250Not in the top three

Workday Skills Cloud6 of 250Not in the top three

iMocha6 of 250Not in the top three

SkillsDB4 of 251Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SkillPanel. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 25 answers that named SkillPanel and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com12

firsthr.app11

guideflow.com11

peoplemanagingpeople.com10

cloudassess.com9

fuel50.com9

clickup.com7

skillpanel.comYour site7

capterra.com6

gartner.com6

Eighty-one of the eighty-eight domain citations in answers naming SkillPanel came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

firsthr.app/compare/training/skills-management-software11

guideflow.com/blog/skills-management-software10

cloudassess.com/blog/best-skills-intelligence-platforms8

clickup.com/blog/skills-management-software7

fuel50.com/blog/skills-intelligence-platforms7

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-skills-management-software7

g2.com/products/skillpanel/reviews5

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-skills-management-software-for-enterprises5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SkillPanel

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SkillPanel; a claim can dispute any of them.

SkillPanel (by DevSkiller) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SkillPanel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SkillPanel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at skillpanel.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.