Every category where a model named SkillsDB for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	2%	11 of 162	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SkillsDB yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SkillsDB across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained12 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall (All‑in‑One): SkillsDB” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Skills intelligence · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If you want a single flat monthly cost that won't creep up with headcount, SkillsDB (~$100/month) is worth a look.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative

“SkillsDB offers excellent value with their free and low-cost tiers” Kimi K2 · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative

“SkillsDB: Starter at flat $100/month (covers ~50 users)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SkillsDB, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SkillsDB was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Skills Base19 of 2415Not in the top three

Eightfold AI10 of 240Not in the top three

iMocha8 of 240Not in the top three

Gloat7 of 240Not in the top three

AG56 of 240Not in the top three

Fuel506 of 240Not in the top three

agyleOS6 of 240Not in the top three

Beamery5 of 240Not in the top three

MuchSkills5 of 240Not in the top three

TechWolf4 of 241Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SkillsDB. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named SkillsDB and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app18

skillsdb.comYour site15

cloudassess.com14

fuel50.com13

f6s.com12

peoplemanagingpeople.com12

hrtechsaas.com11

clickup.com9

guideflow.com8

skills-base.com8

105 of the 120 domain citations in answers naming SkillsDB came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

firsthr.app/compare/training/skills-management-software18

cloudassess.com/blog/best-skills-intelligence-platforms14

hrtechsaas.com/blog/skills-intelligence-software10

skillsdb.com/pricing10

clickup.com/blog/skills-management-software9

fuel50.com/blog/skills-intelligence-platforms8

metaview.ai/resources/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms7

f6s.com/software/category/skills-intelligence6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SkillsDB's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SkillsDB, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at skillsdb.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.