HR AI Index
Index › Vendors › agyleOS · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

agyleOS

19Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Skills intelligence for small business buyers
Rank 71 of 162 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 153
2%18 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market71 of 162
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In skills intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named agyleOS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Skills intelligencePerformance and talent management0%71 of 1620%1under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for agyleOS yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated agyleOS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Option C: Teammeter or agyleOS (Best for HR-light Teams & GDPR Compliance)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Skills intelligence · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as agyleOS, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and agyleOS was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Skills Base13 of 1911Not in the top three
Eightfold AI11 of 190Not in the top three
MuchSkills8 of 192Not in the top three
iMocha8 of 191Not in the top three
Gloat7 of 190Not in the top three
AG56 of 191Not in the top three
SkillsDB6 of 190Not in the top three
edyoucated5 of 190Not in the top three
Kahuna4 of 191Not in the top three
SkillPanel4 of 190Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named agyleOS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 19 answers that named agyleOS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app13
cloudassess.com9
fuel50.com8
blog.imocha.io6
f6s.com6
hrtechsaas.com6
teammeter.com6
cxeverywhere.com5
agyleos.comYour site4
aihr.com4

Sixty-three of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming agyleOS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

firsthr.app/compare/training/skills-management-software13
cloudassess.com/blog/best-skills-intelligence-platforms9
blog.imocha.io/skills-management-software6
teammeter.com/skill-management-software-comparison6
cxeverywhere.com/tools/skills-management-software5
hrtechsaas.com/blog/skills-intelligence-software5
agyleos.com/post/best-skills-management-software4
aihr.com/blog/skills-intelligence4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when agyleOS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as agyleOS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at agyleos.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack