Every category where a model named MuchSkills for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	2%	10 of 162	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MuchSkills yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MuchSkills across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels3

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative4 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“MuchSkills (free tier with visual skills mapping) are the most practical entry points.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · first choice

“Strong alternatives if Skills Base doesn't fit:- MuchSkills: Free tier (up to 10 users)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative

“MuchSkills or Skills Base deliver strong value at a fraction of the cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Skills intelligence · direct prompt · alternative

“The Simple, Visual Mapping Platforms (e.g., MuchSkills, Kahuna)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Skills intelligence · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MuchSkills, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MuchSkills was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Skills Base19 of 2510Not in the top three

Eightfold AI14 of 250Not in the top three

Gloat12 of 251Not in the top three

SkillPanel8 of 251Not in the top three

agyleOS8 of 250Not in the top three

Workday Skills Cloud7 of 251Not in the top three

iMocha6 of 251Not in the top three

365Talents6 of 250Not in the top three

Beamery6 of 250Not in the top three

TalentGuard5 of 251Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MuchSkills. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 25 answers that named MuchSkills and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app11

fuel50.com10

cloudassess.com9

metaview.ai7

hrtechsaas.com6

f6s.com5

365talents.com4

g2.com4

gartner.com4

guideflow.com4

Sixty-four of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming MuchSkills came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

firsthr.app/compare/training/skills-management-software11

cloudassess.com/blog/best-skills-intelligence-platforms9

metaview.ai/resources/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms7

fuel50.com/blog/skills-intelligence-platforms5

hrtechsaas.com/blog/skills-intelligence-software5

f6s.com/software/category/skills-intelligence4

fuel50.com/blog/best-competency-management-software-solutions4

agyleos.com/post/best-skills-management-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MuchSkills's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MuchSkills, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at muchskills.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.