Every category where a model named AG5 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	38 of 162	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%
Workforce planning	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	37 of 89	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AG5 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AG5 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 label1

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose operational tools (AG5, Runn) if your primary need is tracking who's qualified for which shifts” Kimi K2 · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for regulated/frontline work requiring certification tracking” Kimi K2 · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative

“Good if compliance and audit readiness matter, from ~€100/mo” Perplexity Sonar · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AG5, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AG5 was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Skills Base14 of 2410Not in the top three

SkillPanel10 of 242Not in the top three

Eightfold AI9 of 241Not in the top three

Pluralsight Skills9 of 240Not in the top three

Kahuna8 of 240Not in the top three

365Talents7 of 240Not in the top three

iMocha7 of 240Not in the top three

SkillsDB6 of 241Not in the top three

agyleOS6 of 240Not in the top three

MuchSkills5 of 242Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AG5. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 24 answers that named AG5 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com15

firsthr.app14

guideflow.com11

fuel50.com10

cloudassess.com9

g2.com9

hrtechsaas.com9

clickup.com8

inop.ai7

ag5.comYour site6

Ninety-two of the ninety-eight domain citations in answers naming AG5 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

firsthr.app/compare/training/skills-management-software14

clickup.com/blog/skills-management-software8

cloudassess.com/blog/best-skills-intelligence-platforms8

guideflow.com/blog/skills-management-software8

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-skills-management-software8

hrtechsaas.com/blog/skills-intelligence-software7

fuel50.com/blog/skills-intelligence-platforms6

inop.ai/top-platforms-for-skills-intelligence5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AG5's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AG5, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ag5.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.