Every category where a model named OpenSesame for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	42 of 73	29%	7	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	29 of 162	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OpenSesame yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OpenSesame across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	2	1	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative17 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Compliance & skills mapping | OpenSesame, ClearCompany” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Skills intelligence · comparative prompt · first choice

“OpenSesame (For HR-led LMS Integration): ... you want to choose from a vast, diverse marketplace of compliance, safety, and business courses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Online course libraries · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Pay-per-course flexibility | 35,000+ courses ... Excellent if you want to cherry-pick topics” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Online course libraries · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“OpenSesame is best for workforce upskilling, compliance, and skills mapping” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Skills intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“OpenSesame: Vast library (20k+ courses), but users report ineffective/engaging courses, inadequate reporting, limited technical topics, language gaps, slow site, and SCORM/lab issues” Grok 4.1 Fast · Online course libraries · negative prompt · hard negative

“aggregator-style libraries can prioritize quantity over curation” Perplexity Sonar · Online course libraries · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OpenSesame, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OpenSesame was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LinkedIn Learning26 of 315Not in the top three

Udemy Business25 of 314Not in the top three

Skillsoft Percipio17 of 311Not in the top three

Coursera for Business16 of 312Not in the top three

Go116 of 311Not in the top three

Pluralsight12 of 311Not in the top three

TalentLMS8 of 311Not in the top three

BizLibrary7 of 310Not in the top three

Coursera6 of 310Not in the top three

edX6 of 310Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OpenSesame. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 31 answers that named OpenSesame and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goodhabitz.com14

elearningindustry.com12

opensesame.comYour site12

ispringsolutions.com11

reddit.com11

learn.g2.com10

linkedin.com10

docebo.com9

g2.com9

neovation.com9

Ninety-five of the 107 domain citations in answers naming OpenSesame came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

goodhabitz.com/resources/blog/best-online-learning-platforms-for-professional-team-develop11

ispringsolutions.com/blog/the-15-best-off-the-shelf-elearning-content-providers11

opensesame.com/blog/top-skills-training-platforms-202611

elearningindustry.com/top-lms-solutions-with-a-content-library9

goodhabitz.com/resources/blog/elearning-content-providers8

neovation.com/content-libraries/elearning-content-libraries7

reddit.com/r/LearningDevelopment/comments/1jv0kk8/need_advice_which_content_libraries_are_7

intellum.com/resources/blog/best-enterprise-lms-platforms6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OpenSesame's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OpenSesame, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at opensesame.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.