Every category where a model named Khan Academy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	15 of 73	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	40 of 162	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	26 of 80	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Khan Academy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Khan Academy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	1	4
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Alternatives with strong reps: Khan Academy (free), edX, LinkedIn Learning.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · first choice

“free or low-cost platforms such as Coursera, Khan Academy, and LinkedIn Learning for general skills training” Llama 4 Maverick · Online course libraries · budget prompt · alternative

“Cost: Completely free ... Cons: Limited business/soft skills content; no formal certifications” Kimi K2 · Online course libraries · budget prompt · alternative

“Free/Targeted: YouTube, Khan Academy, or niche sites for specifics.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Online course libraries · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Khan Academy, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Khan Academy was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LinkedIn Learning13 of 140Not in the top three

Udemy Business12 of 142Not in the top three

Coursera for Business10 of 141Not in the top three

edX7 of 141Not in the top three

Skillshare7 of 140Not in the top three

YouTube5 of 140Not in the top three

ProProfs Training Maker4 of 142Not in the top three

MasterClass4 of 140Not in the top three

Coursera3 of 141Not in the top three

DataCamp3 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Khan Academy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 14 answers that named Khan Academy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

training.safetyculture.com5

g2.com4

ispringsolutions.com4

proprofstraining.com4

reddit.com4

elearningindustry.com3

goodhabitz.com3

goskills.com3

onlinecourseing.com3

skillscouter.com3

Thirty-six of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming Khan Academy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ispringsolutions.com/blog/the-15-best-off-the-shelf-elearning-content-providers4

proprofstraining.com/blog/online-learning-platforms4

training.safetyculture.com/blog/10-online-course-platforms4

goodhabitz.com/resources/blog/online-soft-skills-training3

goskills.com/resources/affordable-lms3

buddyboss.com/blog/best-online-learning-platforms-for-professionals-and-learners2

digitaldefynd.com/IQ/online-course-legitimate-or-a-scam2

digitalhill.com/blog/best-affordable-lms-small-business-20262

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Khan Academy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Khan Academy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at khanacademy.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.