Every category where a model named ProProfs Training Maker for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Online course libraries	Learning and development	8%	4 of 73	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%
Learning management systems	Learning and development	2%	6 of 74	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	2%	13 of 86	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 22%
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	34 of 116	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	30 of 80	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ProProfs Training Maker yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ProProfs Training Maker across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	5	0	5
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	3	1	1	5
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labels1

Paraphrase9 labels2

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained20 labels4

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“TalentLMS and ProProfs Training Maker are often recommended as the best value options for employee training” Mistral Small · Learning management syst · budget prompt · first choice

“I would recommend ProProfs Training Maker as a course creation software for a mid-sized B2B company” Llama 4 Maverick · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“ProProfs Training Maker - recommended for mid-market teams evaluating a B2B LMS.” Llama 4 Maverick · Online course libraries · direct prompt · first choice

“Best Overall Value (Lowest Per-Learner Cost) ProProfs Training Maker” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Online course libraries · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ProProfs Training Maker, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProProfs Training Maker was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TalentLMS27 of 4713Not in the top three

Coursera for Business13 of 473Not in the top three

Moodle13 of 471Not in the top three

LinkedIn Learning12 of 472Not in the top three

Udemy Business11 of 471Not in the top three

GoSkills10 of 475Not in the top three

360Learning10 of 471Not in the top three

Thinkific7 of 471Not in the top three

Absorb LMS6 of 471Not in the top three

iSpring Learn5 of 470Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ProProfs Training Maker. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 47 answers that named ProProfs Training Maker and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

proprofstraining.comYour site42

goskills.com26

elearningindustry.com15

learnworlds.com14

peoplemanagingpeople.com14

talentlms.com14

educate-me.co12

learn.g2.com12

capterra.com11

digitalhill.com10

128 of the 170 domain citations in answers naming ProProfs Training Maker came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

proprofstraining.com/blog/b2b-lms17

goskills.com/resources/affordable-lms15

proprofstraining.com/blog/online-learning-platforms13

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-lms-for-small-business12

digitalhill.com/blog/best-affordable-lms-small-business-202610

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-small-business10

forbes.com/advisor/business/the-best-learning-management-systems8

ispringsolutions.com/blog/the-15-best-off-the-shelf-elearning-content-providers8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ProProfs Training Maker

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ProProfs Training Maker; a claim can dispute any of them.

ProProfs 1ProProfs LMS 1Proprofs Training 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ProProfs Training Maker's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ProProfs Training Maker, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at proprofstraining.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.