HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Firstup · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Firstup

48Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Frontline employee apps for mid-market buyers
Rank 15 of 97 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Firstup for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Frontline employee appsOnboarding and employee experience0%15 of 979%11accepted challenger
Internal communications and intranetOnboarding and employee experience0%29 of 800%5under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Firstup yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Firstup across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00202
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00303
DeepSeek V4 Flash01203
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200213
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative24 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“→ Blink, Beekeeper, or Firstup” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative
“Aggregated multi-system comms | Firstup” MiniMax M2.5 · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise platforms (Staffbase, Firstup) can run into five- and six-figure annual contracts” Kimi K2 · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Firstup, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Firstup was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Staffbase47 of 484Not in the top three
Blink29 of 482Not in the top three
MangoApps26 of 482Not in the top three
Beekeeper25 of 484Not in the top three
Connecteam23 of 487Not in the top three
Workvivo23 of 480Not in the top three
WorkJam20 of 484Not in the top three
Simpplr15 of 484Not in the top three
Unily15 of 480Not in the top three
LumApps13 of 481Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Firstup. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 48 answers that named Firstup and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mangoapps.com33
staffbase.com22
joinblink.com20
changeengine.com17
guideflow.com17
redeapp.com17
simpplr.com13
workvivo.com12
crewcheck.io10
turnonwork.com10

171 of the 171 domain citations in answers naming Firstup came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Firstup

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Firstup; a claim can dispute any of them.
Firstup (formerly SocialChorus) 2
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Firstup's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Firstup, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at firstup.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.