Every category where a model named MangoApps for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Frontline employee apps	Onboarding and employee experience	2%	6 of 97	0%	11	accepted challenger
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	2%	11 of 80	0%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MangoApps yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MangoApps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	3	4
Mistral Small	0	0	2	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	4	2	6
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	3	4
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	2	2	0	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labels1

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative34 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained18 labels2

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative79 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“MangoApps | Mixed Workforce (Desk & Frontline) | Unified platform ... with AI-native search.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal communications · comparative prompt · first choice

“recommend platforms like Simpplr, Happeo, MangoApps, or Workvivo as strong fits” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal communications · scale prompt · first choice

“My Top Recommendation: MangoApps or Skedulo” MiniMax M2.5 · Frontline employee apps · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Unified platform for mixed desk + frontline staff with HR/learning integration | MangoApps” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MangoApps, over the 79 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MangoApps was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Staffbase50 of 795Not in the top three

Blink39 of 793Not in the top three

Workvivo39 of 792Not in the top three

Simpplr37 of 798Not in the top three

Connecteam28 of 7911Not in the top three

Unily27 of 790Not in the top three

Firstup26 of 790Not in the top three

LumApps25 of 791Not in the top three

Beekeeper21 of 793Not in the top three

Microsoft SharePoint21 of 793Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MangoApps. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 72 of the 79 answers that named MangoApps and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mangoapps.comYour site68

guideflow.com33

simpplr.com29

joinblink.com26

workvivo.com24

staffbase.com22

changeengine.com16

learn.g2.com16

lumapps.com16

peoplemanagingpeople.com15

197 of the 265 domain citations in answers naming MangoApps came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms25

mangoapps.com/articles/best-frontline-communication-software20

mangoapps.com/articles/frontline-communication-platforms-guide20

mangoapps.com/articles/top-modern-intranet-platforms-of-202418

changeengine.com/articles/frontline-communication-tools16

mangoapps.com/articles/best-employee-app-software16

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software15

staffbase.com/blog/frontline-communication-tools15

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MangoApps's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MangoApps, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mangoapps.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.