Every category where a model named LumApps for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	19 of 80	11%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LumApps yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LumApps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	3
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative27 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative14 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative64 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“LumApps is best suited for enterprise organizations that need one intranet platform to support desk-based, frontline, and hybrid employees at scale.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative

“An AI employee hub and intranet platform covering internal communications, workflows, learning, and frontline access” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose LumApps, Unily, or Simpplr if you want a more enterprise-grade modern intranet experience.” GPT-5.4 mini · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Organizations wanting a social intranet with strong Google Workspace integration” Kimi K2 · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Falls short in ease of use (85% vs. industry 95%), support quality, and mobile parity.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative

“LumApps | Poor analytics; limited customization” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LumApps, over the 64 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LumApps was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Staffbase54 of 643Not in the top three

Simpplr49 of 6413Not in the top three

Workvivo47 of 642Not in the top three

Unily44 of 640Not in the top three

Microsoft SharePoint36 of 646Not in the top three

MangoApps25 of 641Not in the top three

Interact22 of 640Not in the top three

Happeo17 of 642Not in the top three

Igloo Software17 of 640Not in the top three

Firstup13 of 640Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LumApps. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 64 answers that named LumApps and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mangoapps.com42

simpplr.com40

workvivo.com33

lumapps.comYour site26

staffbase.com22

axerosolutions.com17

g2.com17

joinblink.com17

learn.g2.com17

oak.com17

222 of the 248 domain citations in answers naming LumApps came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms35

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/platforms-comparison23

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/best-platforms22

mangoapps.com/articles/top-25-intranet-platforms-frontline-desk-workers21

mangoapps.com/articles/top-modern-intranet-platforms-of-202421

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software17

axerosolutions.com/blog/best-intranet-software-platforms-compared15

joinblink.com/intelligence/top-intranet-software-providers14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as LumApps

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LumApps; a claim can dispute any of them.

LumApps + Beekeeper 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LumApps's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LumApps, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lumapps.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.