Every category where a model named Happeo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	16%	1 of 80	5%	21	accepted challenger
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	25 of 81	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Happeo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Happeo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	2	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	1	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1	0	2
Kimi K2	1	0	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct18 labels10

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative17 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained10 labels1

Negative10 labels4not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative58 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Happeo - a best overall intranet platform for small and mid-sized companies, with fast setup, a search and knowledge layer” Llama 4 Maverick · Internal communications · direct prompt · first choice

“Happeo is the strongest default recommendation when your company already uses Google Workspace” Perplexity Sonar · Internal communications · direct prompt · first choice

“recommend platforms like Simpplr, Happeo, MangoApps, or Workvivo as strong fits” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal communications · scale prompt · first choice

“Happeo: Best Overall for Google Workspace Users ... arguably the best choice on the market” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Happeo is less compelling outside Google Workspace environments” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Happeo, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Happeo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Simpplr33 of 586Compare →

Microsoft SharePoint31 of 584Not in the top three

Workvivo29 of 583Not in the top three

Staffbase24 of 582Not in the top three

Jostle19 of 583Not in the top three

LumApps17 of 581Not in the top three

Unily16 of 581Not in the top three

Connecteam12 of 582Not in the top three

Interact12 of 581Not in the top three

MangoApps12 of 580Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Happeo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 58 answers that named Happeo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

happeo.comYour site39

oak.com29

workvivo.com29

mangoapps.com26

learn.g2.com25

simpplr.com25

guideflow.com18

peoplemanagingpeople.com18

gartner.com15

firsthr.app14

199 of the 238 domain citations in answers naming Happeo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

happeo.com/blog/the-best-intranet-platforms-for-small-and-mid-sized-companies-in-202621

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms21

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software20

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/platforms-comparison17

guideflow.com/blog/employee-intranet-software15

oak.com/blog/best-small-business-intranet-software-in-202614

firsthr.app/compare/general/company-intranet-software12

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/best-platforms12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Happeo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Happeo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at happeo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.