Every category where a model named Jostle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	20 of 80	0%	11	accepted challenger
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	23 of 81	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%
Workforce scheduling	Core HR and payroll	0%	65 of 94	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Jostle yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Jostle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	3	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	2
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative15 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“High adoption, people-directory focus, easy for mid-sized B2B without IT overhead.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative

“Modern intranets (like Jostle, MangoApps, or Workvivo) typically go live in weeks.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · alternative

“Jostle — Best for org chart visibility inside an employee hub already used daily.” Llama 4 Maverick · Org charts · negative prompt · alternative

“Choose Jostle if you want something simpler and easier to roll out.” GPT-5.4 mini · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jostle, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jostle was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft SharePoint33 of 427Not in the top three

Connecteam20 of 424Not in the top three

Happeo19 of 422Not in the top three

Simpplr18 of 424Not in the top three

Workvivo17 of 422Not in the top three

Staffbase12 of 421Not in the top three

Unily12 of 421Not in the top three

Google Sites11 of 424Not in the top three

Notion10 of 421Not in the top three

LumApps8 of 421Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jostle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 42 answers that named Jostle and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

workvivo.com22

learn.g2.com20

oak.com20

simpplr.com19

firsthr.app18

blog.jostle.meYour site17

happeo.com17

mangoapps.com14

peoplemanagingpeople.com14

guideflow.com12

156 of the 173 domain citations in answers naming Jostle came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software19

firsthr.app/compare/general/company-intranet-software16

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms16

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/platforms-comparison15

oak.com/blog/best-small-business-intranet-software-in-202614

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/best-platforms12

guideflow.com/blog/employee-intranet-software10

oak.com/blog/10-best-intranet-software-solutions-for-20268

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jostle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jostle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jostle.me is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.