Every category where a model named Google Sites for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	4%	10 of 80	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Sites yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Sites across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labels4

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you already use M365/Google Workspace: Start with SharePoint or Google Sites. It costs $0 extra” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · budget prompt · first choice

“Google Sites ⭐ Best Free Choice” Kimi K2 · Internal communications · budget prompt · first choice

“Google Sites can serve as a simple, free intranet platform” Mistral Small · Internal communications · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Microsoft Viva or Google Sites extensions work but lack polish” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal communications · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Sites, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Sites was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft SharePoint18 of 212Not in the top three

Connecteam15 of 215Not in the top three

Jostle11 of 212Not in the top three

Notion11 of 211Not in the top three

Simpplr8 of 211Not in the top three

Softr6 of 210Not in the top three

Happeo5 of 211Not in the top three

Workvivo5 of 211Not in the top three

Atlassian Confluence5 of 210Not in the top three

Blink5 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Sites. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 21 answers that named Google Sites and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

simpplr.com14

learn.g2.com13

mangoapps.com11

oak.com11

firsthr.app9

softr.io9

workvivo.com7

g2.com6

guideflow.com6

happeo.com6

Ninety-two of the ninety-two domain citations in answers naming Google Sites came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software13

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms12

firsthr.app/compare/general/company-intranet-software9

softr.io/blog/best-intranets-for-small-businesses8

mangoapps.com/articles/top-modern-intranet-platforms-of-20247

guideflow.com/blog/employee-intranet-software6

oak.com/blog/best-small-business-intranet-software-in-20266

toolsforhumans.ai/toolkit/best-intranet-software-small-business6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Google Sites

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Sites; a claim can dispute any of them.

Google Sites (with Google Workspace) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Sites's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Sites, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.