HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Softr · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Softr

13Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Softr was named 5 times in Employee onboarding and 2 other categories, where BambooHR led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market26 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In employee onboarding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Softr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee onboarding	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	26 of 104	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29%
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	0%	38 of 129	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26%
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	48 of 80	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Softr yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Softr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“consider Softr, a no-code web app builder that turns Airtable and Google Sheets into ... marketplaces” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · alternative

“Great for building custom tools, but the free tier is restrictive (only 5 users).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal communications · budget prompt · alternative

“Softr’s free tier is an excellent low‑cost starting point” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee onboarding · budget prompt · alternative

“Best Free Start: Softr (or similar no-code tools)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee onboarding · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Softr, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Softr was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft SharePoint8 of 132Not in the top three

Google Sites6 of 132Not in the top three

Connecteam5 of 132Not in the top three

MyHub Intranet5 of 131Not in the top three

BambooHR3 of 130Not in the top three

Jostle3 of 130Not in the top three

Gusto2 of 131Not in the top three

Spacewalk2 of 131Not in the top three

Gloat2 of 130Not in the top three

HumHub2 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Softr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 13 answers that named Softr and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softr.ioYour site10

learn.g2.com6

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

simpplr.com5

firsthr.app4

happeo.com4

mangoapps.com4

agilityportal.io3

connecteam.com3

guideflow.com3

Thirty-seven of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Softr came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software6

softr.io/blog/best-intranets-for-small-businesses6

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms4

firsthr.app/compare/general/company-intranet-software3

joinblink.com/intelligence/top-intranet-software-providers3

oak.com/blog/best-small-business-intranet-software-in-20263

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-intranet-software-for-small-businesses3

agilityportal.io/blog/intranet-solutions-comparison2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Softr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Softr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at softr.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.