HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Spacewalk · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Spacewalk

8Judge labels

4First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Spacewalk was named 4 times in Internal talent marketpl, where Fuel50 led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business5 of 118

under the label threshold

Mid-market11 of 129

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In internal talent marketpl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Spacewalk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	2%	11 of 129	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Spacewalk yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Spacewalk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels3

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“focus on platforms explicitly designed for SMBs (like Gigged.AI or Spacewalk)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · first choice

“marketed specifically at SMBs, making it a good fit for smaller companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · alternative

“Spacewalk is an ultra-affordable, no-code marketplace builder.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · alternative

“Low-Cost Paid Option: Spacewalk (Starter Plan)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Spacewalk, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spacewalk was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Gloat7 of 80Not in the top three

Eightfold AI5 of 80Not in the top three

Fuel505 of 80Not in the top three

Workday4 of 80Not in the top three

Phenom3 of 80Not in the top three

TalentGuard2 of 81Not in the top three

Gigged.AI2 of 80Not in the top three

Softr2 of 80Not in the top three

Virkware2 of 80Not in the top three

Bitrix241 of 81Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spacewalk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 8 answers that named Spacewalk and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fuel50.com5

gartner.com5

sourceforge.net5

peoplemanagingpeople.com4

recruiterslineup.com4

sprad.io4

talentguard.com4

getapp.com3

mentorcliq.com3

softwaresuggest.com3

Forty of the forty domain citations in answers naming Spacewalk came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-talent-marketplaces5

fuel50.com/blog/internal-talent-marketplace-platforms4

recruiterslineup.com/best-talent-marketplace-platforms-reviewed4

sprad.io/blog/internal-talent-marketplace-software-in-2025-vendors-features-pricing-and-rf4

talentguard.com/blog/best-internal-talent-marketplace-platforms4

sourceforge.net/software/talent-marketplace/for-small-business3

sourceforge.net/software/talent-marketplace/free-version3

awesomic.com/blog/ultimate-list-talent-marketplaces-for-businesses-in-20252

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Spacewalk

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Spacewalk; a claim can dispute any of them.

Spacewalk (Starter Plan) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spacewalk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spacewalk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at spacewalk.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.