Every category where a model named Microsoft SharePoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	10%	4 of 80	51%	37	criticized challenger
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	58 of 77	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft SharePoint yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft SharePoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	1	2	0	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	0	2	5
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	2	3
Mistral Small	0	1	1	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	3	4
Kimi K2	1	0	0	2	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	3	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	3	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct20 labels8

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative25 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained27 labels13

Scale-constrained10 labels2

Negative35 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative119 labels in all, every segment counted; 23 of the 26 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most companies on a tight budget, Pebb (free tier) or Microsoft SharePoint/Teams (if you already use Microsoft 365) offer the best value-to-cost ratio.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · budget prompt · first choice

“Start with SharePoint or Google Sites. It costs $0 extra and aligns with security protocols” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · budget prompt · first choice

“SharePoint is often the best value, because it's included in many Microsoft plans” GPT-5.4 mini · Internal communications · budget prompt · first choice

“If you're heavily invested in Microsoft 365 → SharePoint is the natural choice” Kimi K2 · Internal communications · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“SharePoint if you need a simple, low-maintenance intranet” Perplexity Sonar · Internal communications · negative prompt · hard negative

“Great for document management but frustrating as a full intranet—90% of projects reportedly underperform without heavy customization” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative

“Out of the box, SharePoint is a document repository, not an intranet... Who should avoid it: Organizations with small HR/IT teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative

“SharePoint is not a standalone "intranet platform" in the traditional sense... It requires significant IT resources to customize” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal communications · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft SharePoint, over the 119 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft SharePoint was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Simpplr61 of 1199Not in the top three

Workvivo50 of 1193Not in the top three

Staffbase44 of 1191Not in the top three

Unily39 of 1191Not in the top three

LumApps36 of 1191Not in the top three

Jostle33 of 1196Not in the top three

Connecteam32 of 11911Not in the top three

Happeo31 of 11910Not in the top three

MangoApps21 of 1192Not in the top three

Atlassian Confluence19 of 1190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft SharePoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 106 of the 119 answers that named Microsoft SharePoint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

workvivo.com64

simpplr.com60

learn.g2.com58

mangoapps.com52

oak.com50

firsthr.app39

guideflow.com39

agilityportal.io37

g2.com34

happeo.com34

467 of the 467 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft SharePoint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software58

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms50

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/best-platforms38

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/platforms-comparison38

firsthr.app/compare/general/company-intranet-software37

guideflow.com/blog/employee-intranet-software37

oak.com/blog/best-small-business-intranet-software-in-202624

joinblink.com/intelligence/top-intranet-software-providers23

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Microsoft SharePoint

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft SharePoint; a claim can dispute any of them.

SharePoint 11Legacy SharePoint (On-Premises) 1Microsoft SharePoint (Native) 1Microsoft SharePoint (with Viva Connections/Engage) 1Microsoft SharePoint / Teams 1Microsoft SharePoint Online 1Microsoft SharePoint Online (with Viva) 1Microsoft SharePoint and Viva 1SharePoint + Viva Engage 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft SharePoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft SharePoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.