Every category where a model named Atlassian Confluence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	25 of 80	33%	12	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Atlassian Confluence yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Atlassian Confluence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	2	1	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Best for Documentation: Confluence ... Excellent for documentation, but less "social" than Connecteam.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal communications · budget prompt · alternative

“Ideal for teams already using Atlassian tools; strong for documentation and collaborative workspaces.” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative

“Both offer free tiers that can be used to create a simple intranet” Mistral Small · Internal communications · budget prompt · alternative

“If you need structured knowledge documentation → Confluence” Kimi K2 · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Better as a structured knowledge/documentation hub than a full employee-comms intranet.” Perplexity Sonar · Internal communications · comparative prompt · soft negative

“primarily designed for documentation and collaboration rather than a full-featured intranet” Mistral Small · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative

“While these are powerful, they often require significant IT overhead” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal communications · direct prompt · soft negative

“Not ideal as a standalone internal-communications hub.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Atlassian Confluence, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Atlassian Confluence was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft SharePoint19 of 245Not in the top three

Simpplr16 of 244Not in the top three

Workvivo13 of 242Not in the top three

Notion11 of 242Not in the top three

Staffbase11 of 241Not in the top three

Happeo9 of 243Not in the top three

LumApps9 of 241Not in the top three

Unily9 of 241Not in the top three

Connecteam8 of 244Not in the top three

Jostle7 of 242Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Atlassian Confluence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 24 answers that named Atlassian Confluence and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

simpplr.com14

mangoapps.com11

learn.g2.com10

workvivo.com10

firsthr.app8

happeo.com8

oak.com8

atlassian.comYour site7

lumapps.com7

peoplemanagingpeople.com7

Eighty-three of the ninety domain citations in answers naming Atlassian Confluence came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms11

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software10

firsthr.app/compare/general/company-intranet-software8

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/best-platforms8

lumapps.com/insights/blog/best-intranet-platforms6

mangoapps.com/articles/top-modern-intranet-platforms-of-20246

guideflow.com/blog/employee-intranet-software5

joinblink.com/intelligence/top-intranet-software-providers5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Atlassian Confluence

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Atlassian Confluence; a claim can dispute any of them.

Confluence 8Confluence (Atlassian) 3Confluence by Atlassian 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Atlassian Confluence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Atlassian Confluence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at atlassian.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.