Every category where a model named MyHub Intranet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	2%	14 of 80	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MyHub Intranet yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MyHub Intranet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained10 labels3

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“MyHub is the clearest pick because it is specifically described as the "most accessible entry point"” Perplexity Sonar · Internal communications · budget prompt · first choice

“MyHub at $83/month offers excellent value with no IT requirements” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal communications · budget prompt · alternative

“MyHub: ~$83/month flat for 25 users (drag-and-drop builder)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal communications · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MyHub Intranet, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MyHub Intranet was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft SharePoint16 of 163Not in the top three

Zoho Connect9 of 160Not in the top three

Connecteam7 of 163Not in the top three

Jostle5 of 161Not in the top three

Softr5 of 160Not in the top three

Google Sites4 of 161Not in the top three

Simpplr4 of 160Not in the top three

Bitrix243 of 162Not in the top three

ClickUp3 of 160Not in the top three

ThoughtFarmer3 of 160Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MyHub Intranet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 16 answers that named MyHub Intranet and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com14

tophrsoftware.com11

guideflow.com10

oak.com10

softr.io10

peoplemanagingpeople.com8

agilityportal.io7

firsthr.app6

simpplr.com6

workvivo.com6

Eighty-eight of the eighty-eight domain citations in answers naming MyHub Intranet came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software14

tophrsoftware.com/tools/best-employee-intranet-platforms11

guideflow.com/blog/employee-intranet-software10

oak.com/blog/best-small-business-intranet-software-in-20268

agilityportal.io/blog/intranet-solutions-comparison7

softr.io/blog/best-intranets-for-small-businesses7

firsthr.app/compare/general/company-intranet-software6

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-intranet-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as MyHub Intranet

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MyHub Intranet; a claim can dispute any of them.

MyHub 4

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MyHub Intranet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MyHub Intranet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at myhubintranet.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.