Every category where a model named ThoughtFarmer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	4%	9 of 80	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ThoughtFarmer yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ThoughtFarmer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels2

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Simpplr and ThoughtFarmer are top choices due to their modern features, ease of use, and strong user reviews” Mistral Small · Internal communications · direct prompt · first choice

“making it the top recommendation for your use case” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal communications · direct prompt · first choice

“ThoughtFarmer if you want a purpose-built mid-market intranet with transparent per-user pricing” Perplexity Sonar · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative

“ThoughtFarmer - a mid-market cloud intranet with transparent per-user pricing, starting at $6/user/month.” Llama 4 Maverick · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ThoughtFarmer, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ThoughtFarmer was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft SharePoint12 of 173Not in the top three

Happeo9 of 176Not in the top three

Simpplr9 of 171Not in the top three

Connecteam6 of 172Not in the top three

Workvivo5 of 171Not in the top three

Jostle4 of 171Not in the top three

Zoho Connect4 of 171Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors4 of 170Not in the top three

MyHub Intranet3 of 170Not in the top three

Oak Engage3 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ThoughtFarmer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 17 answers that named ThoughtFarmer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com15

learn.g2.com14

simpplr.com9

happeo.com8

oak.com8

workvivo.com7

firsthr.app5

g2.com5

gartner.com5

hubengage.com5

Eighty-one of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming ThoughtFarmer came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/employee-intranet-software15

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software14

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms7

happeo.com/blog/the-best-intranet-platforms-for-small-and-mid-sized-companies-in-20266

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/platforms-comparison6

firsthr.app/compare/general/company-intranet-software5

gartner.com/reviews/market/intranet-packaged-solutions5

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-employee-intranet-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ThoughtFarmer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ThoughtFarmer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at thoughtfarmer.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.