Every category where a model named Zoho Connect for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	2%	12 of 80	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zoho Connect yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zoho Connect across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained14 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“We recommend trialing Zoho Connect and SharePoint first” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal communications · budget prompt · first choice

“Zoho Connect (Best for growing teams on Zoho ecosystem)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal communications · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for easy setup - Budget-friendly pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal communications · budget prompt · alternative

“best low-cost standalone option for SMBs” GPT-5.4 mini · Internal communications · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zoho Connect, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho Connect was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft SharePoint18 of 196Not in the top three

Connecteam10 of 193Not in the top three

MyHub Intranet9 of 192Not in the top three

Bitrix245 of 193Not in the top three

Jostle5 of 191Not in the top three

Pebb4 of 194Not in the top three

Google Sites4 of 191Not in the top three

Notion4 of 190Not in the top three

Oak Engage4 of 190Not in the top three

ThoughtFarmer4 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zoho Connect. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 19 answers that named Zoho Connect and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com18

guideflow.com17

oak.com13

simpplr.com11

softr.io11

firsthr.app9

peoplemanagingpeople.com9

agilityportal.io8

connecteam.com8

tophrsoftware.com8

112 of the 112 domain citations in answers naming Zoho Connect came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software18

guideflow.com/blog/employee-intranet-software17

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms10

firsthr.app/compare/general/company-intranet-software9

oak.com/blog/most-affordable-intranet9

tophrsoftware.com/tools/best-employee-intranet-platforms8

agilityportal.io/blog/intranet-solutions-comparison7

oak.com/blog/best-small-business-intranet-software-in-20267

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho Connect's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho Connect, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zohoconnect.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.