Index › Vendors › Oak Engage · September 2026 Edition

Oak · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Oak Engage

22Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

11 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oak Engage was named 8 times in Internal communications and 1 other category, where Happeo led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business15 of 82

under the label threshold

Mid-market22 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise20 of 73

under the label threshold

In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oak Engage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	22 of 80	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%
Frontline employee apps	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	42 of 97	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oak Engage yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oak Engage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative5 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Oak Engage is the best overall choice for organizations that need one intranet platform for frontline, desk-based and remote employees.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal communications · comparative prompt · first choice

“Enterprise-leaning mixed desk + frontline | Staffbase / Oak Engage” Perplexity Sonar · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · alternative

“look for "intranet-on-top" software (like Omnia, Oak Engage, or hubley)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · alternative

“4. Oak Engage (Best for Frontline Communication)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal communications · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oak Engage, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oak Engage was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft SharePoint18 of 223Not in the top three

Simpplr16 of 223Not in the top three

Staffbase13 of 221Not in the top three

Workvivo13 of 220Not in the top three

Happeo11 of 224Not in the top three

LumApps10 of 220Not in the top three

Interact9 of 220Not in the top three

Unily8 of 220Not in the top three

Jostle7 of 221Not in the top three

Connecteam7 of 220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oak Engage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named Oak Engage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

oak.com18

workvivo.com14

simpplr.com13

mangoapps.com12

firsthr.app9

happeo.com9

learn.g2.com9

guideflow.com8

lumapps.com8

joinblink.com7

No domain is on file for Oak Engage, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms10

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software9

firsthr.app/compare/general/company-intranet-software8

oak.com/blog/best-small-business-intranet-software-in-20268

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/platforms-comparison8

happeo.com/blog/the-best-intranet-platforms-for-small-and-mid-sized-companies-in-20267

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/best-platforms7

guideflow.com/blog/employee-intranet-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oak Engage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oak Engage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.