Every category where a model named Igloo Software for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	24 of 80	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Igloo Software yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Igloo Software across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top-Rated Alternatives (4.5+): Workvivo, Simpplr, Staffbase, Blink, Unily, Igloo” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal communications · negative prompt · alternative

“consider Igloo as a close runner‑up” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Igloo Software, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Igloo Software was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Simpplr17 of 221Not in the top three

LumApps17 of 220Not in the top three

Staffbase17 of 220Not in the top three

Unily17 of 220Not in the top three

Workvivo14 of 222Not in the top three

Microsoft SharePoint13 of 220Not in the top three

MangoApps12 of 220Not in the top three

Interact10 of 220Not in the top three

Firstup8 of 220Not in the top three

Happeo5 of 221Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Igloo Software. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 22 answers that named Igloo Software and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

simpplr.com18

mangoapps.com14

workvivo.com14

axerosolutions.com7

learn.g2.com7

lumapps.com7

happeo.com6

unily.com6

dev4side.com5

gartner.com5

Eighty-nine of the eighty-nine domain citations in answers naming Igloo Software came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms15

mangoapps.com/articles/top-modern-intranet-platforms-of-20249

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/best-platforms9

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/platforms-comparison8

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software7

mangoapps.com/articles/top-25-intranet-platforms-frontline-desk-workers7

axerosolutions.com/blog/best-intranet-software-platforms-compared5

dev4side.com/en/blog/best-intranet-platforms5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Igloo Software

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Igloo Software; a claim can dispute any of them.

Igloo 7

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Igloo Software's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Igloo Software, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at igloosoftware.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.