HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Glint · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Glint

7Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Glint was named 3 times in Internal talent marketpl and 2 other categories, where Fuel50 led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market82 of 129

under the label threshold

Enterprise28 of 82

under the label threshold

In internal talent marketpl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Glint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	0%	82 of 129	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26%
Mentoring software	Learning and development	0%	29 of 55	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Together at 37%
Succession planning	Performance and talent management	0%	75 of 99	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Glint yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Glint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	2	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Data & Engagement Hybrid: Culture Amp / Glint” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mentoring software · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Glint, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Glint was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Eightfold AI4 of 70Not in the top three

Culture Amp3 of 70Not in the top three

Lattice3 of 70Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors2 of 71Not in the top three

15Five2 of 70Not in the top three

Fuel502 of 70Not in the top three

Gloat2 of 70Not in the top three

Chronus1 of 71Not in the top three

Microsoft Viva1 of 71Not in the top three

Oracle1 of 71Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Glint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 7 answers that named Glint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

betterworks.com1

corma.io1

engagedly.com1

hrone.cloud1

icehrm.com1

nextinhr.com1

peoplemanagingpeople.com1

performyard.com1

sogolytics.com1

sprad.io1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Glint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

betterworks.com/magazine/best-360-degree-feedback-tools1

corma.io/blog/saas-procurement-policy-template1

engagedly.com/blog/choosing-360-degree-feedback-software1

hrone.cloud/blog/hrms-evaluation-checklist-india1

icehrm.com/blog/demo-questions-to-ask-hr-software-vendors-q-961

nextinhr.com/hr-checklists/hr-software-selection-checklist1

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-360-degree-feedback-software1

performyard.com/articles/enterprise-employee-feedback-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Glint

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Glint; a claim can dispute any of them.

Glint (LinkedIn) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Glint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Glint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at glint.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.