Every category where a model named GoodHabitz for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Online course libraries	Learning and development	2%	7 of 73	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	89 of 162	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for GoodHabitz yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated GoodHabitz across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	2	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels2

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“includes platforms such as Mitti, Proprofs Training, and GoodHabits” Llama 4 Maverick · Online course libraries · budget prompt · first choice

“Best if your main goal is soft skills and engagement-led development” Perplexity Sonar · Online course libraries · direct prompt · alternative

“Best if you need behavioral/soft-skills content: GoodHabitz” Perplexity Sonar · Online course libraries · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for: Engaging, practical content” MiniMax M2.5 · Online course libraries · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as GoodHabitz, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GoodHabitz was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LinkedIn Learning15 of 234Not in the top three

Coursera for Business15 of 233Not in the top three

Udemy Business14 of 230Not in the top three

Skillsoft Percipio11 of 231Not in the top three

Pluralsight10 of 230Not in the top three

Go19 of 230Not in the top three

OpenSesame5 of 230Not in the top three

TalentLMS4 of 231Not in the top three

Absorb LMS4 of 230Not in the top three

BizLibrary4 of 230Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GoodHabitz. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named GoodHabitz and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goodhabitz.comYour site22

ispringsolutions.com10

docebo.com8

proprofstraining.com8

simplilearn.com8

g2.com6

learn.g2.com6

elearningindustry.com5

learnworlds.com5

linkedin.com5

Sixty-one of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming GoodHabitz came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

goodhabitz.com/resources/blog/elearning-content-providers15

ispringsolutions.com/blog/the-15-best-off-the-shelf-elearning-content-providers10

goodhabitz.com/resources/blog/best-online-learning-platforms-for-professional-team-develop7

simplilearn.com/best-online-learning-platforms-for-enterprises-article7

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/lms-content-library6

proprofstraining.com/blog/b2b-lms6

elearningindustry.com/top-lms-solutions-with-a-content-library5

techclass.com/blog/best-corporate-and-business-training-platforms-and-lms-reviews-rankings5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as GoodHabitz

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as GoodHabitz; a claim can dispute any of them.

GoodHabits 1Goodhabitz 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GoodHabitz's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GoodHabitz, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at goodhabitz.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.