One category · what the models named insteadAlternatives to GoodHire, as AI models named them
In the September 2026 Edition, 135 of the 216 answers collected in the one category where GoodHire holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.
Background screening
Thirty-one of the seventy-two answers did not name GoodHire; it was the first choice in twenty. The first choices in those thirty-one answers, nine products in all, the eight most named:
Thirty-nine of the seventy-two answers did not name GoodHire; it was the first choice in eight. The first choices in those thirty-nine answers, seven products in all:
Sixty-five of the seventy-two answers did not name GoodHire; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those sixty-five answers, eight products in all:
How to read this
A category is asked six ways of each of twelve models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is seventy-two answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled GoodHire neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named GoodHire only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from GoodHire's side.
Every answer and every label is in the free record. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of GoodHire was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.