Every category where a model named Lattice Compensate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	0%	49 of 189	29%	7	under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lattice Compensate yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lattice Compensate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained13 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Only makes sense if you already use Lattice for performance management (note it carries a $4,000 annual minimum” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compensation management · budget prompt · alternative

“upgrade to a paid platform like Compease or Lattice only when you outgrow spreadsheets” Kimi K2 · Compensation management · budget prompt · alternative

“Small teams wanting a simple add-on → Lattice Compensate” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compensation management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Performance‑linked compensation | Lattice Compensate” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Compensation management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“can be expensive for very small teams (<10 employees), but it's excellent if you already use Lattice” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compensation management · budget prompt · soft negative

“$6/user/month (but $4,000 minimum annual)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Compensation management · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lattice Compensate, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lattice Compensate was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Pave24 of 2519Not in the top three

Ravio23 of 256Not in the top three

BambooHR17 of 252Not in the top three

Comprehensive16 of 257Not in the top three

Salary.com CompAnalyst13 of 253Not in the top three

QuotaPath10 of 251Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ10 of 250Not in the top three

Salary.com9 of 251Not in the top three

OpenComp8 of 250Not in the top three

Aeqium7 of 254Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lattice Compensate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 25 answers that named Lattice Compensate and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app21

comprehensive.io19

gartner.com18

learn.g2.com16

g2.com13

hibob.com12

peoplemanagingpeople.com11

fitsmallbusiness.com10

ravio.com9

bamboohr.com8

137 of the 137 domain citations in answers naming Lattice Compensate came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

firsthr.app/compare/payroll/compensation-management-tools21

comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-management-software19

gartner.com/reviews/market/compensation-management-software17

learn.g2.com/best-compensation-management-software16

hibob.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software12

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-compensation-management-software10

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-compensation-management-software9

quotapath.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lattice Compensate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lattice Compensate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lattice.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.