Every category where a model named QuotaPath for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	4%	9 of 189	0%	18	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for QuotaPath yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated QuotaPath across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	7	0	7
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	1	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct15 labels7

Paraphrase11 labels5

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained13 labels4

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“QuotaPath is the clearest budget-friendly option if your need is sales commission compensation because it starts at $35/user/month” Perplexity Sonar · Compensation management · budget prompt · first choice

“If you have straightforward-to-moderate plans and want a fast, transparent, budget-friendly solution → QuotaPath” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compensation management · direct prompt · first choice

“PromptPayPlanner and QuotaPath also appear to be specifically designed with cost-consciousness in mind.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compensation management · budget prompt · first choice

“Mid-market teams that prioritize a positive rep experience often choose QuotaPath” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compensation management · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as QuotaPath, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and QuotaPath was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Pave31 of 4628Not in the top three

BambooHR29 of 463Not in the top three

Comprehensive25 of 467Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ25 of 463Not in the top three

Ravio17 of 465Not in the top three

Aeqium16 of 466Not in the top three

Salary.com16 of 462Not in the top three

Salary.com CompAnalyst15 of 460Not in the top three

HiBob14 of 463Not in the top three

Xactly13 of 460Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named QuotaPath. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 46 answers that named QuotaPath and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

comprehensive.io32

hibob.com28

gartner.com27

learn.g2.com27

quotapath.comYour site18

g2.com17

firsthr.app16

guideflow.com14

bamboohr.com13

peoplemanagingpeople.com13

187 of the 205 domain citations in answers naming QuotaPath came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-management-software32

hibob.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software28

gartner.com/reviews/market/compensation-management-software27

learn.g2.com/best-compensation-management-software26

quotapath.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software17

firsthr.app/compare/payroll/compensation-management-tools16

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-compensation-management-software13

bamboohr.com/blog/compensation-management-tools11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when QuotaPath's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as QuotaPath, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quotapath.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.