HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › OpenComp Market Pulse · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

OpenComp Market Pulse

4Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. OpenComp Market Pulse was named 1 time in Pay equity, where Syndio led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business33 of 84

under the label threshold

Mid-market41 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In pay equity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named OpenComp Market Pulse for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Pay equity	Compensation and total rewards	0%	41 of 60	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OpenComp Market Pulse yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OpenComp Market Pulse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Cost: Free bundled with Gusto payroll” MiniMax M2.5 · Pay equity · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OpenComp Market Pulse, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OpenComp Market Pulse was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Gusto4 of 43Not in the top three

Payscale3 of 40Not in the top three

Syndio2 of 40Not in the top three

Trusaic PayParity2 of 40Not in the top three

Pave1 of 41Not in the top three

ADP DataCloud1 of 40Not in the top three

BambooHR1 of 40Not in the top three

ChartHop1 of 40Not in the top three

Compport1 of 40Not in the top three

Deel1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OpenComp Market Pulse. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named OpenComp Market Pulse and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

compensationtools.net4

gartner.com4

peoplemanagingpeople.com4

trustradius.com4

g2.com3

payscale.com3

soteriahr.com3

sourceforge.net3

figures.hr2

firsthr.app2

Thirty-two of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming OpenComp Market Pulse came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

compensationtools.net/best-pay-equity-software4

gartner.com/reviews/market/pay-equity-software4

trustradius.com/pay-equity4

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-ai-pay-equity-software3

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-pay-equity-software3

soteriahr.com/pay-equity-analysis-software3

figures.hr/post/top-compensation-software-for-efficient-hr-management2

firsthr.app/compare/payroll/compensation-management-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OpenComp Market Pulse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OpenComp Market Pulse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at opencomp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.