HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Oracle PeopleSoft · September 2026 Edition

Oracle · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Oracle PeopleSoft

8Judge labels

0First choices

6Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle PeopleSoft was named 3 times in HRIS and HCM platforms and 1 other category, where Rippling led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market35 of 46

under the label threshold

Enterprise31 of 48

under the label threshold

In hris and hcm platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle PeopleSoft for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
HRIS and HCM platforms	Core HR and payroll	0%	35 of 46	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 22%
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	70 of 81	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle PeopleSoft yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle PeopleSoft across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms to Avoid: PeopleSoft, Lawson (now Infor), and JD Edwards.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · HRIS and HCM platforms · negative prompt · hard negative

“older versions of SAP, Oracle PeopleSoft, or distinct mainframes, relying strictly on their native org reporting can be painful” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle PeopleSoft, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle PeopleSoft was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BambooHR4 of 80Not in the top three

Workday HCM4 of 80Not in the top three

UKG Pro3 of 82Not in the top three

Gusto3 of 81Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors3 of 80Not in the top three

Dayforce2 of 82Not in the top three

ADP Workforce Now2 of 81Not in the top three

Verint Workforce Management2 of 81Not in the top three

Aspect WFM2 of 80Not in the top three

Blue Yonder Workforce Management2 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle PeopleSoft. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 8 answers that named Oracle PeopleSoft and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

infotech.com3

forbes.com2

gartner.com2

softwareadvice.com2

worldmetrics.org2

adp.com1

assembled.com1

awms-system.com1

cxtoday.com1

dam.infor.com1

Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Oracle PeopleSoft came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

infotech.com/software-reviews/categories/workforce-management-enterprise3

softwareadvice.com/hr/workforce-management-software-comparison2

worldmetrics.org/best/workforce-management-wfm-software2

adp.com/resources/articles-and-insights/articles/w/what-is-wfm-software.aspx1

assembled.com/blog/beyond-the-rfp-11-things-most-wfm-vendors-dont-want-you-to-double-click1

assembled.com/page/aspect-wfm-review1

assembled.com/page/best-workforce-management-software1

awms-system.com/website/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Market_Guide_for_Workforce.pdf1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle PeopleSoft

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle PeopleSoft; a claim can dispute any of them.

PeopleSoft 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle PeopleSoft's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle PeopleSoft, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.