HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Blue Yonder Workforce Management · September 2026 Edition

Blue Yonder · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Blue Yonder Workforce Management

14Judge labels

2First choices

3Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Blue Yonder Workforce Management was named 2 times in Workforce management sui, where ADP Workforce Now led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business55 of 70

under the label threshold

Mid-market26 of 95

under the label threshold

Enterprise20 of 82

under the label threshold

In workforce management sui · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Blue Yonder Workforce Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce management suites	Core HR and payroll	0%	26 of 95	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Blue Yonder Workforce Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Blue Yonder Workforce Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase4 labels2

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for retail demand/labor optimization: Blue Yonder” GPT-5.4 mini · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Blue Yonder Workforce Management, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Blue Yonder Workforce Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Dayforce10 of 143Not in the top three

UKG Pro9 of 144Not in the top three

Workday7 of 141Not in the top three

Deputy6 of 141Not in the top three

When I Work6 of 140Not in the top three

Workday Workforce Management5 of 141Not in the top three

Homebase5 of 140Not in the top three

Verint Workforce Management4 of 141Not in the top three

UKG Pro Workforce Management3 of 142Not in the top three

ADP Workforce Now3 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Blue Yonder Workforce Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 14 answers that named Blue Yonder Workforce Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com6

worldmetrics.org6

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

nowsta.com4

viewpointanalysis.com4

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com3

gartner.com3

indeavor.com3

learn.g2.com3

rajeshkumar.xyz3

Forty of the forty domain citations in answers naming Blue Yonder Workforce Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

nowsta.com/blog/best-employee-scheduling-software-for-large-teams4

viewpointanalysis.com/post/workforce-management-software-options-20264

worldmetrics.org/best/workforce-management-scheduling-software4

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/amp/tools/10-best-workforce-management-software-for-enter3

guideflow.com/blog/shift-management-software3

indeavor.com/blog/best-shift-scheduling-software3

rajeshkumar.xyz/blog/workforce-management-software3

assembled.com/page/best-workforce-management-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Blue Yonder Workforce Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Blue Yonder Workforce Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

Blue Yonder 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Blue Yonder Workforce Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Blue Yonder Workforce Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at blueyonder.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.