HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Deputy · September 2026 Edition
8 categories · Ranked

Deputy

273Judge labels
25First choices
23Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
8Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
26% in Workforce scheduling for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 94 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 26 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In workforce scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Deputy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Workforce schedulingCore HR and payroll26%1 of 940%26accepted challenger
Workforce management suitesCore HR and payroll6%5 of 953%31accepted challenger
Time and attendanceCore HR and payroll0%17 of 905%19accepted challenger
Frontline employee appsOnboarding and employee experience0%12 of 970%15accepted challenger
Leave and absence managementCore HR and payroll0%22 of 890%6under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28%
Workforce planningWorkforce planning and analytics0%24 of 890%4under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%
HR AI assistantsOnboarding and employee experience0%77 of 1190%1under 10 labels · led by Workativ Assistant at 12%
Succession planningPerformance and talent management0%73 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Deputy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Deputy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.522307
GPT-5.4 mini11103
Gemini 3.5 Flash172111
Perplexity Sonar24309
Grok 4.1 Fast154111
Mistral Small11507
DeepSeek V4 Flash673016
Llama 4 Maverick22206
Qwen 3.7 Flash26109
Kimi K225108
GLM 4.7 FlashX27009
MiniMax M2.503407

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct52 labels8
Paraphrase55 labels11
Comparative66 labels15not counted in share
Budget-constrained36 labels4
Scale-constrained37 labels2
Negative27 labels9not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative273 labels in all, every segment counted; 25 of the 49 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Deputy (Best Overall Balance) ... Deputy strikes the best balance between sophisticated feature sets (like AI forecasting) and user-friendly design.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Deputy if you have multiple locations or compliance needs, or Connecteam if you have deskless/field workers” Kimi K2 · Workforce scheduling · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Start with Deputy for the best mix of hourly-workforce features, ease of deployment, compliance, and cost at mid-size scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce management sui · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Look at Homebase, Deputy, or When I Work\u2014these are entirely different tools from the booking apps above.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“including *Hubstaff, Deputy, Apploye, and Time Doctor*) and found that they systematically shared worker data\u2014such as names and emails\u2014with third-party trackers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Time and attendance · negative prompt · soft negative
“Deputy (~$5/user/mo, strong for compliance/shifts but higher min.)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Workforce management sui · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Deputy, over the 273 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Deputy was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
When I Work158 of 27316Not in the top three
Connecteam139 of 27341Not in the top three
Rippling65 of 27313Not in the top three
UKG Pro57 of 27314Not in the top three
BambooHR44 of 2736Not in the top three
ADP Workforce Now40 of 2736Not in the top three
Workday40 of 2735Not in the top three
7shifts39 of 2730Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Deputy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 225 of the 273 answers that named Deputy and are not a share of its labels.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Deputy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Deputy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at deputy.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.